“Erasure” and organizations: Updating Orwell


Parul Sehgal, in a piece for the New York Times Magazine earlier this year, examines how practices of “erasure” operate to ignore or marginalize people or groups:

‘‘Erasure’’ refers to the practice of collective indifference that renders certain people and groups invisible. The word migrated out of the academy, where it alluded to the tendency of ideologies to dismiss inconvenient facts, and is increasingly used to describe how inconvenient people are dismissed, their history, pain and achievements blotted out. Compared with words like ‘‘diversity’’ and ‘‘representation,’’ with their glib corporate gloss, ‘‘erasure’’ is a blunt word for a blunt process. It goes beyond simplistic discussions of quotas to ask: Whose stories are taught and told? Whose suffering is recognized? Whose dead are mourned?

Although Sehgal’s piece addresses erasure primarily in the context of diversity and difference, it has broader applications to any individuals or cohorts who find themselves marginalized or forgotten. In this way, it relates strongly to the Orwellian concept of “unpersons,” i.e., those whose existences have been expunged from institutional memory and records.

Of course, there are differences between individuals and groups being rendered invisible when they are present in a place or time, versus being extinguished from institutional memory. The former is often more of a felt, immediate, in-your-face insult and injury. The latter can be, too, but perhaps less so after a point of separation. The common bond between erasure and the creating of unpersons is that they are potential manifestations of the eliminationist instinct, that facile ability to regard other human beings as objects to be tormented, excised, or forgotten.

3 responses

  1. One searing example, among many, is for all of those whom experience tragedy, only one or very few make it into the press. Other forms of inaccurate accounting are: writing “revisionist history”, “spinning” a narrative, telling a white lie, etc. The whole truth and nothing but the truth, must create such fear if there are so many terms in our lexicon to describe this conscientious decision.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: